Dominica vs Zambia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Dominica
0.2933 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.2868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
61st
Zambia rank
62nd

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Dominica
  • Zambia
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 0.2933 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.

Dominica ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 62nd of 134 countries.

Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2788 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
1970s 0.2445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 0.2856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0674 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2182 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 0.2693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 0.2771 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1501 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 0.2889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2617 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 0.2927 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0205 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Dominica or Zambia?
Dominica, at 0.2933 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Dominica and Zambia?
0.0065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Zambia?
42 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Zambia rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Dominica ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 62nd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Zambia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/dominica/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/dominica/zambia/">Dominica vs Zambia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.