Cuba vs Nicaragua: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Cuba
2.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
2.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
26th
Nicaragua rank
23rd

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Cuba
  • Nicaragua
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 2.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 26th and Nicaragua ranks 23rd of 134 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 18.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 25.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8379 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 24.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 29.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 28.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 20.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 19.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 9.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 6.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 3.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Cuba or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 2.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Cuba and Nicaragua?
0.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Nicaragua rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Cuba ranks 26th and Nicaragua ranks 23rd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Nicaragua: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/cuba/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/cuba/nicaragua/">Cuba vs Nicaragua: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.