Colombia vs Egypt: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Colombia
1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt
1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
34th
Egypt rank
33rd

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Colombia
  • Egypt
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 34th and Egypt ranks 33rd of 134 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Egypt Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia
1970s 0.7417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3535 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3882 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia
1980s 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.555 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia
1990s 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1669 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Colombia or Egypt?
Egypt, at 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Colombia and Egypt?
0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Egypt?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Egypt rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Colombia ranks 34th and Egypt ranks 33rd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Egypt: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/colombia/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/colombia/egypt-arab-rep/">Colombia vs Egypt: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.