China vs Japan: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China
0.5483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
0.5853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
54th
Japan rank
52nd

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • China
  • Japan
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.5853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

China ranks 54th and Japan ranks 52nd of 134 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1970s 0.1345 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5812 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4467 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1980s 0.2721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7776 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0.4238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 0.5041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6977 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1935 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 0.5931 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0253 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 0.5554 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6406 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China or Japan?
Japan, at 0.5853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China and Japan?
0.037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Japan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Japan rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
China ranks 54th and Japan ranks 52nd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Japan: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/china/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/china/japan/">China vs Japan: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.