China vs Hungary: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China
0.5483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary
0.4522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
54th
Hungary rank
56th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • China
  • Hungary
0123196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.5483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 0.0961 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

China ranks 54th and Hungary ranks 56th of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Hungary in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Hungary Difference Ahead
1960s 0.091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 0.1345 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 0.2721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 0.4238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 0.5041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 0.5931 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4921 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2020s 0.5554 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1935 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China or Hungary?
China, at 0.5483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China and Hungary?
0.0961 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Hungary?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Hungary rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
China ranks 54th and Hungary ranks 56th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Hungary: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/china/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/china/hungary/">China vs Hungary: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.