Central African Republic vs Chad: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Central African Republic
0.009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad
0.0107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
112th
Chad rank
111th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Chad
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 112th and Chad ranks 111th of 134 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Chad Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.0066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Central African Republic or Chad?
Chad, at 0.0107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Central African Republic and Chad?
0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Chad?
28 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Chad rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Central African Republic ranks 112th and Chad ranks 111th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Chad: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/central-african-republic/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/central-african-republic/chad/">Central African Republic vs Chad: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.