Burkina Faso vs Romania: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Burkina Faso
0.0843 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
87th
Romania rank
88th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Romania
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.0843 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 48 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Romania ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 87th and Romania ranks 88th of 134 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Romania Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.0561 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.0652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4434 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0728 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1657 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0806 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2020s 0.0837 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0282 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Burkina Faso or Romania?
Burkina Faso, at 0.0843 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Burkina Faso and Romania?
0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Romania?
48 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Romania rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Burkina Faso ranks 87th and Romania ranks 88th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Romania: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/burkina-faso/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/burkina-faso/romania/">Burkina Faso vs Romania: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.