Barbados vs Eswatini: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Barbados
9.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
13.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
6th
Eswatini rank
4th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Barbados
  • Eswatini
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 13.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 9.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 3.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.4 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 6th and Eswatini ranks 4th of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 161.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 159.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 109.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 104.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 75.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 52.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 42.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 40.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 28.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 17.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 9.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Barbados or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 13.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 9.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Barbados and Eswatini?
3.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Eswatini rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Barbados ranks 6th and Eswatini ranks 4th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Eswatini: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/barbados/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/barbados/eswatini/">Barbados vs Eswatini: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.