Bahamas vs Zambia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bahamas
0.2844 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.2868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
63rd
Zambia rank
62nd

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zambia
00.10.20.3196619942023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.2868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2844 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 63rd and Zambia ranks 62nd of 134 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0516 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0384 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1970s 0.1673 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 0.1879 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0674 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1205 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.2511 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1501 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.2673 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2617 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.2835 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bahamas or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.2868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2844 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bahamas and Zambia?
0.0024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zambia?
42 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Zambia rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bahamas ranks 63rd and Zambia ranks 62nd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zambia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bahamas-the/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bahamas-the/zambia/">Bahamas vs Zambia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.