Australia vs Rwanda: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Australia
0.1903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.1855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
74th
Rwanda rank
75th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Australia
  • Rwanda
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.1903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 75th of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0633 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0837 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.1862 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1371 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.2028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0914 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.1806 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1826 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1992 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0202 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia or Rwanda?
Australia, at 0.1903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and Rwanda?
0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Australia ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 75th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Rwanda: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/australia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/australia/rwanda/">Australia vs Rwanda: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.