Australia vs Morocco: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Australia
0.1903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
0.1939 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
74th
Morocco rank
73rd

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Australia
  • Morocco
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 0.1939 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 74th and Morocco ranks 73rd of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0864 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0347 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0517 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1976 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 0.147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1947 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 0.1862 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 0.2028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 0.1806 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3883 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 0.179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia or Morocco?
Morocco, at 0.1939 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and Morocco?
0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Morocco?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Morocco rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Australia ranks 74th and Morocco ranks 73rd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Morocco: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/australia/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/australia/morocco/">Australia vs Morocco: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.