Angola vs Gabon: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola
0.0425 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gabon
0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
98th
Gabon rank
96th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Angola
  • Gabon
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0425 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 98th and Gabon ranks 96th of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Gabon in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Gabon Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
1970s 0.023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0172 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
1980s 0.0103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0306 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0203 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gabon
1990s 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0325 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gabon
2000s 0.0147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gabon
2010s 0.0196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0485 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gabon
2020s 0.0366 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Gabon?
Gabon, at 0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0425 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Gabon?
0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Gabon?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Gabon rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Angola ranks 98th and Gabon ranks 96th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Gabon: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/gabon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/gabon/">Angola vs Gabon: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.