Afghanistan vs Portugal: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Afghanistan
0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Afghanistan rank
119th
Portugal rank
116th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Portugal
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.8 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 119th and Portugal ranks 116th of 134 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0703 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0628 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 0.0093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0604 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0511 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0564 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0536 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1987 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1942 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Afghanistan or Portugal?
Portugal, at 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2017.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Afghanistan and Portugal?
0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Portugal?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Afghanistan and Portugal rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Afghanistan ranks 119th and Portugal ranks 116th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Portugal: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/afghanistan/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/afghanistan/portugal/">Afghanistan vs Portugal: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.