Mozambique vs Oceania: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Mozambique
10.26 % change on previous year
in 2024
Oceania
-8.59 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mozambique rank
29th
Oceania rank
29th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Mozambique
  • Oceania
-50050100150196219932024

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 10.26 % change on previous year against -8.59 % change on previous year in Oceania, a difference of 18.85 % change on previous year.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.2 times Oceania's.

The two have swapped places 29 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Oceania ahead.

Mozambique ranks 29th and Oceania ranks 29th of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 3 and Oceania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Oceania Difference Ahead
1960s 7.41 % change on previous year 7.68 % change on previous year 0.2703 % change on previous year Oceania
1970s -1.21 % change on previous year 3.47 % change on previous year 4.68 % change on previous year Oceania
1980s -16.84 % change on previous year 2.41 % change on previous year 19.25 % change on previous year Oceania
1990s 10.57 % change on previous year 4.03 % change on previous year 6.54 % change on previous year Mozambique
2000s 22.45 % change on previous year -1.98 % change on previous year 24.43 % change on previous year Mozambique
2010s 6.83 % change on previous year 0.5326 % change on previous year 6.3 % change on previous year Mozambique
2020s -11.36 % change on previous year -1.53 % change on previous year 9.83 % change on previous year Oceania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Mozambique or Oceania?
Mozambique, at 10.26 % change on previous year against -8.59 % change on previous year in Oceania as of 2024.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Mozambique and Oceania?
18.85 % change on previous year, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Oceania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Mozambique and Oceania rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Mozambique ranks 29th and Oceania ranks 29th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Oceania: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/mozambique/oceania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/mozambique/oceania/">Mozambique vs Oceania: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 10,282 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.