Martinique vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Martinique
-6.17 % change on previous year
in 2005
Trinidad and Tobago
-5.82 % change on previous year
in 2007
Martinique rank
127th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
125th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Martinique
  • Trinidad and Tobago
-50050100196219842007

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports -5.82 % change on previous year against -6.17 % change on previous year in Martinique, a difference of 0.35 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Martinique ahead.

Martinique ranks 127th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 125th of 165 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Martinique averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Martinique Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s -7.83 % change on previous year 0.3466 % change on previous year 8.18 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
1970s -5.65 % change on previous year -2.54 % change on previous year 3.12 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
1980s -2.44 % change on previous year -2.24 % change on previous year 0.203 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
1990s -0.3086 % change on previous year 1.22 % change on previous year 1.53 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 1.97 % change on previous year -13.42 % change on previous year 15.4 % change on previous year Martinique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Martinique or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at -5.82 % change on previous year against -6.17 % change on previous year in Martinique as of 2007.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Martinique and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.35 % change on previous year, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Martinique and Trinidad and Tobago?
44 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2005.
How do Martinique and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Martinique ranks 127th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 125th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Martinique vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/martinique/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/martinique/trinidad-and-tobago/">Martinique vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 10,282 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.