Guinea-Bissau vs Iraq: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Guinea-Bissau
0.639 % change on previous year
in 2024
Iraq
0.7255 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
71st
Iraq rank
68th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Iraq
-1000100200300196219932024

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.7255 % change on previous year against 0.639 % change on previous year in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0865 % change on previous year.

That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 71st and Iraq ranks 68th of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Iraq in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Iraq Difference Ahead
1960s 3.29 % change on previous year 20.45 % change on previous year 17.16 % change on previous year Iraq
1970s 3.62 % change on previous year 42.78 % change on previous year 39.17 % change on previous year Iraq
1980s 0.3747 % change on previous year 7.5 % change on previous year 7.13 % change on previous year Iraq
1990s 0 % change on previous year -33.83 % change on previous year 33.83 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.9897 % change on previous year -7.68 % change on previous year 8.67 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
2010s 1.34 % change on previous year 5.43 % change on previous year 4.09 % change on previous year Iraq
2020s 0.5204 % change on previous year -1.06 % change on previous year 1.58 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Guinea-Bissau or Iraq?
Iraq, at 0.7255 % change on previous year against 0.639 % change on previous year in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Guinea-Bissau and Iraq?
0.0865 % change on previous year, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Iraq?
54 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Iraq rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 71st and Iraq ranks 68th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Iraq: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/guinea-bissau/iraq/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/guinea-bissau/iraq/">Guinea-Bissau vs Iraq: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 10,282 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.