Ecuador vs El Salvador: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
2 % change on previous year
in 2024
El Salvador
1.54 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ecuador rank
56th
El Salvador rank
57th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • El Salvador
-50-250255075196219932024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2 % change on previous year against 1.54 % change on previous year in El Salvador, a difference of 0.46 % change on previous year.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 35 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was El Salvador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 56th and El Salvador ranks 57th of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 4.36 % change on previous year 6.99 % change on previous year 2.63 % change on previous year El Salvador
1970s 0.6324 % change on previous year 8.91 % change on previous year 8.28 % change on previous year El Salvador
1980s -1.19 % change on previous year -1.46 % change on previous year 0.2663 % change on previous year Ecuador
1990s 3.84 % change on previous year 8.72 % change on previous year 4.88 % change on previous year El Salvador
2000s 4.66 % change on previous year 1.21 % change on previous year 3.44 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s 1.79 % change on previous year 3.26 % change on previous year 1.47 % change on previous year El Salvador
2020s -5.38 % change on previous year -0.9524 % change on previous year 4.43 % change on previous year El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or El Salvador?
Ecuador, at 2 % change on previous year against 1.54 % change on previous year in El Salvador as of 2024.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and El Salvador?
0.46 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and El Salvador rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 56th and El Salvador ranks 57th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs El Salvador: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/ecuador/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/ecuador/el-salvador/">Ecuador vs El Salvador: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 10,282 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.