Central African Republic vs Guinea: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Central African Republic
-0.6923 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guinea
-0.5164 % change on previous year
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
100th
Guinea rank
98th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Guinea
-50050100150197720002024

How they compare

Guinea currently reports -0.5164 % change on previous year against -0.6923 % change on previous year in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.1759 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Guinea ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 100th and Guinea ranks 98th of 165 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Guinea Difference Ahead
1980s 13.62 % change on previous year 25.72 % change on previous year 12.1 % change on previous year Guinea
1990s 13.67 % change on previous year 2.26 % change on previous year 11.41 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2000s 0.4396 % change on previous year 0.4769 % change on previous year 0.0373 % change on previous year Guinea
2010s 3.17 % change on previous year 1.07 % change on previous year 2.1 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2020s -0.1123 % change on previous year 0.4737 % change on previous year 0.586 % change on previous year Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Central African Republic or Guinea?
Guinea, at -0.5164 % change on previous year against -0.6923 % change on previous year in Central African Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Central African Republic and Guinea?
0.1759 % change on previous year, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Guinea?
36 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Guinea rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Central African Republic ranks 100th and Guinea ranks 98th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Guinea: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/central-african-republic/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/central-african-republic/guinea/">Central African Republic vs Guinea: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 10,282 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.