Georgia vs Latvia: Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per square kilometre
Georgia
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2007
Latvia
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
123rd
Latvia rank
123rd
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per square kilometre over time
- Georgia
- Latvia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha per square kilometre.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 123rd and Latvia ranks 123rd of 137 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0097 ha per square kilometre | 0.2232 ha per square kilometre | 0.2135 ha per square kilometre | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per square kilometre | 0.2091 ha per square kilometre | 0.209 ha per square kilometre | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar crops primary — area harvested, per square kilometre, Georgia or Latvia?
- Georgia, at 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2007.
- What is the difference in sugar crops primary — area harvested, per square kilometre between Georgia and Latvia?
- 0 ha per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2007.
- How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for sugar crops primary — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Georgia ranks 123rd and Latvia ranks 123rd of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.