Puerto Rico vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate

Puerto Rico
233.33 % change on previous year
in 2002
United Republic of Tanzania
0.1101 % change on previous year
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
1st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
2nd

Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-1000100200196219932024

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 233.33 % change on previous year against 0.1101 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 233.22 % change on previous year.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 2,119.5 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1962 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 155 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s -6.92 % change on previous year 12.74 % change on previous year 19.66 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1970s -6.81 % change on previous year -2.1 % change on previous year 4.71 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1980s -4.43 % change on previous year -5.04 % change on previous year 0.6079 % change on previous year Puerto Rico
1990s -13.31 % change on previous year 0.1012 % change on previous year 13.41 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 45.74 % change on previous year 5.64 % change on previous year 40.1 % change on previous year Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — area harvested, annual growth rate, Puerto Rico or United Republic of Tanzania?
Puerto Rico, at 233.33 % change on previous year against 0.1101 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2002.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — area harvested, annual growth rate between Puerto Rico and United Republic of Tanzania?
233.22 % change on previous year, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and United Republic of Tanzania?
41 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2002.
How do Puerto Rico and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for sugar crops primary — area harvested, annual growth rate?
Puerto Rico ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-area-harvested-annual-growth-rate/puerto-rico-us/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-area-harvested-annual-growth-rate/puerto-rico-us/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Puerto Rico vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 10,404 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.