Malawi vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Sugar Crops β€” Feed

Malawi
434 1000 t
in 2023
Small island developing States (SIDS)
2,337 1000 t
in 2023
Malawi rank
20th
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
17th

Sugar Crops β€” Feed over time

  • Malawi
  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k201020162023

How they compare

Small island developing States (SIDS) currently reports 2,337 1000 t against 434 1000 t in Malawi, a difference of 1,903 1000 t.

That makes Small island developing States (SIDS)'s figure about 5.4 times Malawi's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Small island developing States (SIDS) has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 20th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 17th of 146 countries.

Small island developing States (SIDS) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Small island developing States (SIDS) Difference Ahead
2010s 251.3 1000 t 1,981 1000 t 1,730 1000 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
2020s 395.75 1000 t 1,999 1000 t 1,603 1000 t Small island developing States (SIDS)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops β€” feed, Malawi or Small island developing States (SIDS)?
Small island developing States (SIDS), at 2,337 1000 t against 434 1000 t in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops β€” feed between Malawi and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
1,903 1000 t, with Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Small island developing States (SIDS) rank globally for sugar crops β€” feed?
Malawi ranks 20th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 17th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar Crops β€” Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Sugar Crops β€” Feed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-feed/malawi/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-feed/malawi/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Malawi vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Sugar Crops β€” Feed</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops β€” Feed
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
177 places, 2,241 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.