Guatemala vs Syrian Arab Republic: Sugar Crops — Domestic supply quantity

Guatemala
26,410 1000 t
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
36 1000 t
in 2023
Guatemala rank
15th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
15th

Sugar Crops — Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Guatemala
  • Syrian Arab Republic
010.0k20.0k30.0k201020162023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 26,410 1000 t against 36 1000 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 26,374 1000 t.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 733.6 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 15th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 15th of 156 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
2010s 27,823 1000 t 502.9 1000 t 27,320 1000 t Guatemala
2020s 26,362 1000 t 37.25 1000 t 26,325 1000 t Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops — domestic supply quantity, Guatemala or Syrian Arab Republic?
Guatemala, at 26,410 1000 t against 36 1000 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops — domestic supply quantity between Guatemala and Syrian Arab Republic?
26,374 1000 t, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Syrian Arab Republic?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for sugar crops — domestic supply quantity?
Guatemala ranks 15th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 15th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar Crops — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Syrian Arab Republic: Sugar Crops — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-domestic-supply-quantity/guatemala/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-domestic-supply-quantity/guatemala/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Guatemala vs Syrian Arab Republic: Sugar Crops — Domestic supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
203 places, 2,761 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.