Colombia vs Sierra Leone: Sugar cane — Residuals
Sugar cane — Residuals over time
- Colombia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports -40 1000 t against -511 1000 t in Colombia, a difference of 471 1000 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Colombia ranks 140th and Sierra Leone ranks 139th of 142 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -337.3 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 337.3 1000 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | -169.5 1000 t | -14.25 1000 t | 155.25 1000 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — residuals, Colombia or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at -40 1000 t against -511 1000 t in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — residuals between Colombia and Sierra Leone?
- 471 1000 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Sierra Leone?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Sierra Leone rank globally for sugar cane — residuals?
- Colombia ranks 140th and Sierra Leone ranks 139th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.