Colombia vs Eastern Asia: Sugar cane — Losses
Sugar cane — Losses over time
- Colombia
- Eastern Asia
How they compare
Eastern Asia currently reports 5,403 1000 t against 1,702 1000 t in Colombia, a difference of 3,701 1000 t.
That makes Eastern Asia's figure about 3.2 times Colombia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Eastern Asia has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 7th and Eastern Asia ranks 7th of 88 countries.
Eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Eastern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,798 1000 t | 5,771 1000 t | 3,974 1000 t | Eastern Asia |
| 2020s | 1,677 1000 t | 5,427 1000 t | 3,750 1000 t | Eastern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — losses, Colombia or Eastern Asia?
- Eastern Asia, at 5,403 1000 t against 1,702 1000 t in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — losses between Colombia and Eastern Asia?
- 3,701 1000 t, with Eastern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Eastern Asia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Eastern Asia rank globally for sugar cane — losses?
- Colombia ranks 7th and Eastern Asia ranks 7th of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.