Eswatini vs Sudan: Sugar cane — Gross Production Value
Eswatini
248,391 1000 Int$
in 2024
Sudan
189,433 1000 Int$
in 2024
Eswatini rank
29th
Sudan rank
32nd
Sugar cane — Gross Production Value over time
- Eswatini
- Sudan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 248,391 1000 Int$ against 189,433 1000 Int$ in Sudan, a difference of 58,958 1000 Int$.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Eswatini ranks 29th and Sudan ranks 32nd of 103 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 248,654 1000 Int$ | 273,196 1000 Int$ | 24,542 1000 Int$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 245,240 1000 Int$ | 203,644 1000 Int$ | 41,596 1000 Int$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — gross production value, Eswatini or Sudan?
- Eswatini, at 248,391 1000 Int$ against 189,433 1000 Int$ in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — gross production value between Eswatini and Sudan?
- 58,958 1000 Int$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Sudan rank globally for sugar cane — gross production value?
- Eswatini ranks 29th and Sudan ranks 32nd of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.