Madagascar vs Northern Europe: Sugar cane — Feed
Sugar cane — Feed over time
- Madagascar
- Northern Europe
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 96 1000 t against 1 1000 t in Northern Europe, a difference of 95 1000 t.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 96.0 times Northern Europe's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 27th and Northern Europe ranks 9th of 106 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Northern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 184.7 1000 t | 1.3 1000 t | 183.4 1000 t | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 133.75 1000 t | 0.25 1000 t | 133.5 1000 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — feed, Madagascar or Northern Europe?
- Madagascar, at 96 1000 t against 1 1000 t in Northern Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — feed between Madagascar and Northern Europe?
- 95 1000 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Northern Europe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Northern Europe rank globally for sugar cane — feed?
- Madagascar ranks 27th and Northern Europe ranks 9th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.