Lesotho vs Morocco: Sugar beet — Residuals
Sugar beet — Residuals over time
- Lesotho
- Morocco
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Morocco, a difference of 0 1000 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Morocco ahead.
Lesotho ranks 1st and Morocco ranks 1st of 134 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 t | -38 1000 t | 38 1000 t | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 0 1000 t | 27 1000 t | 27 1000 t | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar beet — residuals, Lesotho or Morocco?
- Lesotho, at 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Morocco as of 2021.
- What is the difference in sugar beet — residuals between Lesotho and Morocco?
- 0 1000 t, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Morocco?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Lesotho and Morocco rank globally for sugar beet — residuals?
- Lesotho ranks 1st and Morocco ranks 1st of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar beet — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.