Chile vs Croatia: Sugar beet — Gross Production Value
Chile
38,098 1000 USD
in 2024
Croatia
43,851 1000 USD
in 2017
Chile rank
29th
Croatia rank
27th
Sugar beet — Gross Production Value over time
- Chile
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 43,851 1000 USD against 38,098 1000 USD in Chile, a difference of 5,753 1000 USD.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 29th and Croatia ranks 27th of 51 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 147,042 1000 USD | 27,628 1000 USD | 119,414 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2000s | 103,198 1000 USD | 39,046 1000 USD | 64,152 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 80,138 1000 USD | 38,084 1000 USD | 42,055 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar beet — gross production value, Chile or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 43,851 1000 USD against 38,098 1000 USD in Chile as of 2017.
- What is the difference in sugar beet — gross production value between Chile and Croatia?
- 5,753 1000 USD, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Croatia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Croatia rank globally for sugar beet — gross production value?
- Chile ranks 29th and Croatia ranks 27th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar beet — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.