Guatemala vs Namibia: Sugar beet — Food

Guatemala
0 1000 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 1000 t
in 2023
Guatemala rank
7th
Namibia rank
7th

Sugar beet — Food over time

  • Guatemala
  • Namibia
00.20.40.60.81201020162023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 1000 t.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 7th and Namibia ranks 7th of 34 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar beet — food, Guatemala or Namibia?
Guatemala, at 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar beet — food between Guatemala and Namibia?
0 1000 t, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Namibia?
7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Namibia rank globally for sugar beet — food?
Guatemala ranks 7th and Namibia ranks 7th of 34 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar beet — Food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Sugar beet — Food
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
61 places, 678 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.