Australia and New Zealand vs Rwanda: Stimulants — Processing

Australia and New Zealand
2 1000 t
in 2023
Rwanda
3 1000 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
10th
Rwanda rank
9th

Stimulants — Processing over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Rwanda
012345201020162023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 3 1000 t against 2 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1 1000 t.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.5 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 86 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Rwanda Difference Ahead
2010s 2 1000 t 1.7 1000 t 0.3 1000 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 2.25 1000 t 1 1000 t 1.25 1000 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher stimulants — processing, Australia and New Zealand or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 3 1000 t against 2 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in stimulants — processing between Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda?
1 1000 t, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda rank globally for stimulants — processing?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Stimulants — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Rwanda: Stimulants — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/stimulants-processing/australia-and-new-zealand/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/stimulants-processing/australia-and-new-zealand/rwanda/">Australia and New Zealand vs Rwanda: Stimulants — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Stimulants — Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
124 places, 1,711 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.