Ecuador vs Tunisia: Starchy Roots — Production
Starchy Roots — Production over time
- Ecuador
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 436 1000 t against 412 1000 t in Ecuador, a difference of 24 1000 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 95th and Tunisia ranks 94th of 179 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 456.5 1000 t | 400 1000 t | 56.5 1000 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 428.75 1000 t | 434 1000 t | 5.25 1000 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starchy roots — production, Ecuador or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 436 1000 t against 412 1000 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in starchy roots — production between Ecuador and Tunisia?
- 24 1000 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Tunisia rank globally for starchy roots — production?
- Ecuador ranks 95th and Tunisia ranks 94th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Starchy Roots — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.