Hungary vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Soyabeans β€” Residuals

Hungary
28 1000 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
30 1000 t
in 2023
Hungary rank
3rd
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
1st

Soyabeans β€” Residuals over time

  • Hungary
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-300-200-1000100201020162023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 30 1000 t against 28 1000 t in Hungary, a difference of 2 1000 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 3rd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st of 182 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 21.6 1000 t -90 1000 t 111.6 1000 t Hungary
2020s 22.75 1000 t -7.5 1000 t 30.25 1000 t Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soyabeans β€” residuals, Hungary or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 30 1000 t against 28 1000 t in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in soyabeans β€” residuals between Hungary and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
2 1000 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for soyabeans β€” residuals?
Hungary ranks 3rd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soyabeans β€” Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Soyabeans β€” Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soyabeans-residuals/hungary/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soyabeans-residuals/hungary/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Hungary vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Soyabeans β€” Residuals</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soyabeans β€” Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,875 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.