Guatemala vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sorghum — Production, annual growth rate

Guatemala
7.48 % change on previous year
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
8.43 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guatemala rank
34th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
32nd

Sorghum — Production, annual growth rate over time

  • Guatemala
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-1000100200196219932024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 8.43 % change on previous year against 7.48 % change on previous year in Guatemala, a difference of 0.95 % change on previous year.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 34th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 32nd of 124 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 19.47 % change on previous year -1.88 % change on previous year 21.35 % change on previous year Guatemala
1970s 4.96 % change on previous year 18.14 % change on previous year 13.18 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 1.49 % change on previous year 0.6637 % change on previous year 0.8252 % change on previous year Guatemala
1990s -3.41 % change on previous year 4.85 % change on previous year 8.26 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 0.015 % change on previous year 20.35 % change on previous year 20.34 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2010s -0.3048 % change on previous year 0.8829 % change on previous year 1.19 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2020s -0.148 % change on previous year 1.95 % change on previous year 2.1 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sorghum — production, annual growth rate, Guatemala or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 8.43 % change on previous year against 7.48 % change on previous year in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in sorghum — production, annual growth rate between Guatemala and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.95 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for sorghum — production, annual growth rate?
Guatemala ranks 34th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 32nd of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sorghum — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sorghum — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sorghum-production-annual-growth-rate/guatemala/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sorghum-production-annual-growth-rate/guatemala/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Guatemala vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sorghum — Production, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sorghum — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 8,170 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sorghum — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.