Italy vs Kazakhstan: Sorghum — Area harvested, per capita
Italy
0.0007 ha per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0.0009 ha per person
in 2024
Italy rank
57th
Kazakhstan rank
54th
Sorghum — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0009 ha per person against 0.0007 ha per person in Italy, a difference of 0.0002 ha per person.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 57th and Kazakhstan ranks 54th of 108 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Italy |
| 2000s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Italy |
| 2010s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Italy |
| 2020s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sorghum — area harvested, per capita, Italy or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0009 ha per person against 0.0007 ha per person in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sorghum — area harvested, per capita between Italy and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0002 ha per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Kazakhstan rank globally for sorghum — area harvested, per capita?
- Italy ranks 57th and Kazakhstan ranks 54th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sorghum — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sorghum — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.