Namibia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sorghum — Area harvested, annual growth rate

Namibia
6.17 % change on previous year
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
9.65 % change on previous year
in 2024
Namibia rank
44th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
41st

Sorghum — Area harvested, annual growth rate over time

  • Namibia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-1000100200300400196219932024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 9.65 % change on previous year against 6.17 % change on previous year in Namibia, a difference of 3.48 % change on previous year.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.6 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 36 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Namibia ranks 44th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 41st of 124 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 5.79 % change on previous year 7.42 % change on previous year 1.63 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 3.44 % change on previous year 9.63 % change on previous year 6.19 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 1.97 % change on previous year 2.67 % change on previous year 0.6925 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1990s -1.37 % change on previous year 4.75 % change on previous year 6.12 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 4.19 % change on previous year 6.46 % change on previous year 2.26 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2010s -3.99 % change on previous year -1.46 % change on previous year 2.54 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 88.42 % change on previous year 3.19 % change on previous year 85.23 % change on previous year Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sorghum — area harvested, annual growth rate, Namibia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 9.65 % change on previous year against 6.17 % change on previous year in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in sorghum — area harvested, annual growth rate between Namibia and United Republic of Tanzania?
3.48 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Namibia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for sorghum — area harvested, annual growth rate?
Namibia ranks 44th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 41st of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sorghum — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sorghum — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sorghum-area-harvested-annual-growth-rate/namibia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sorghum-area-harvested-annual-growth-rate/namibia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Namibia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sorghum — Area harvested, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sorghum — Area harvested, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 8,176 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sorghum — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.