Greece vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Soft-Fibres, Other — Stock Variation

Greece
0 t
in 2013
Land Locked Developing Countries
4 t
in 2013
Greece rank
13th
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
6th

Soft-Fibres, Other — Stock Variation over time

  • Greece
  • Land Locked Developing Countries
-60-40-200204060196119872013

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries currently reports 4 t against 0 t in Greece, a difference of 4 t.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.

Greece ranks 13th and Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 6th of 53 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 2 and Land Locked Developing Countries in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Land Locked Developing Countries Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1970s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1980s -5 t -0.2 t 4.8 t Land Locked Developing Countries
1990s 5 t -0.8 t 5.8 t Greece
2000s 0 t -2.1 t 2.1 t Greece
2010s 0 t 5 t 5 t Land Locked Developing Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soft-fibres, other — stock variation, Greece or Land Locked Developing Countries?
Land Locked Developing Countries, at 4 t against 0 t in Greece as of 2013.
What is the difference in soft-fibres, other — stock variation between Greece and Land Locked Developing Countries?
4 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Land Locked Developing Countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Greece and Land Locked Developing Countries rank globally for soft-fibres, other — stock variation?
Greece ranks 13th and Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 6th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soft-Fibres, Other — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greece vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Soft-Fibres, Other — Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-stock-variation/greece/land-locked-developing-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-stock-variation/greece/land-locked-developing-countries/">Greece vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Soft-Fibres, Other — Stock Variation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
79 places, 3,775 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.