Least Developed Countries vs Mauritius: Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity

Least Developed Countries
236 t
in 2013
Mauritius
457 t
in 2013
Least Developed Countries rank
20th
Mauritius rank
18th

Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity over time

  • Least Developed Countries
  • Mauritius
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119872013

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 457 t against 236 t in Least Developed Countries, a difference of 221 t.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.9 times Least Developed Countries's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Least Developed Countries ranks 20th and Mauritius ranks 18th of 30 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Least Developed Countries averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1970s 88.3 t 0 t 88.3 t Least Developed Countries
1980s 310.1 t 0 t 310.1 t Least Developed Countries
1990s 69.5 t 0 t 69.5 t Least Developed Countries
2000s 1,177 t 0.1 t 1,177 t Least Developed Countries
2010s 188.75 t 473.75 t 285 t Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soft-fibres, other — export quantity, Least Developed Countries or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 457 t against 236 t in Least Developed Countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in soft-fibres, other — export quantity between Least Developed Countries and Mauritius?
221 t, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries and Mauritius?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Least Developed Countries and Mauritius rank globally for soft-fibres, other — export quantity?
Least Developed Countries ranks 20th and Mauritius ranks 18th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries vs Mauritius: Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-export-quantity/least-developed-countries/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-export-quantity/least-developed-countries/mauritius/">Least Developed Countries vs Mauritius: Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
126 places, 5,938 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.