Jordan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity

Jordan
154 t
in 2013
United Republic of Tanzania
145 t
in 2013
Jordan rank
24th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
2nd

Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity over time

  • Jordan
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05001.0k1.5k196119872013

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 154 t against 145 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 9 t.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Jordan ranks 24th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 92 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1970s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1980s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1990s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2000s 6.7 t 233.2 t 226.5 t United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 162.75 t 52.25 t 110.5 t Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soft-fibres, other — export quantity, Jordan or United Republic of Tanzania?
Jordan, at 154 t against 145 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2013.
What is the difference in soft-fibres, other — export quantity between Jordan and United Republic of Tanzania?
9 t, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and United Republic of Tanzania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Jordan and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for soft-fibres, other — export quantity?
Jordan ranks 24th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 92 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-export-quantity/jordan/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-export-quantity/jordan/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Jordan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
126 places, 5,938 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.