Indonesia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value

Indonesia
167 1000 Int$
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
502 1000 Int$
in 2024
Indonesia rank
16th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
13th

Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value over time

  • Indonesia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 502 1000 Int$ against 167 1000 Int$ in Indonesia, a difference of 335 1000 Int$.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.0 times Indonesia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 16th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 13th of 24 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 3 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 3,964 1000 Int$ 467.89 1000 Int$ 3,496 1000 Int$ Indonesia
1970s 453.4 1000 Int$ 179.9 1000 Int$ 273.5 1000 Int$ Indonesia
1980s 177.1 1000 Int$ 165.6 1000 Int$ 11.5 1000 Int$ Indonesia
1990s 223.1 1000 Int$ 435.6 1000 Int$ 212.5 1000 Int$ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 200.5 1000 Int$ 468.4 1000 Int$ 267.9 1000 Int$ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 176.5 1000 Int$ 515.3 1000 Int$ 338.8 1000 Int$ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 167.6 1000 Int$ 503.6 1000 Int$ 336 1000 Int$ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sisal, raw — gross production value, Indonesia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 502 1000 Int$ against 167 1000 Int$ in Indonesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in sisal, raw — gross production value between Indonesia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
335 1000 Int$, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Indonesia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for sisal, raw — gross production value?
Indonesia ranks 16th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 13th of 24 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sisal-raw-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i/indonesia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sisal-raw-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i/indonesia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Indonesia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)
Unit
1000 Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
46 places, 2,706 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.