Dominican Republic vs Western Africa: Sisal — Production

Dominican Republic
30 t
in 2013
Western Africa
185 t
in 2013
Dominican Republic rank
19th
Western Africa rank
16th

Sisal — Production over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Western Africa
05001.0k1.5k196119872013

How they compare

Western Africa currently reports 185 t against 30 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 155 t.

That makes Western Africa's figure about 6.2 times Dominican Republic's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 19th and Western Africa ranks 16th of 22 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 5 and Western Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Western Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 651.33 t 100 t 551.33 t Dominican Republic
1970s 252 t 100 t 152 t Dominican Republic
1980s 210.4 t 112 t 98.4 t Dominican Republic
1990s 270.2 t 132.2 t 138 t Dominican Republic
2000s 295.6 t 154.9 t 140.7 t Dominican Republic
2010s 43.25 t 174.75 t 131.5 t Western Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sisal — production, Dominican Republic or Western Africa?
Western Africa, at 185 t against 30 t in Dominican Republic as of 2013.
What is the difference in sisal — production between Dominican Republic and Western Africa?
155 t, with Western Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Western Africa?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Dominican Republic and Western Africa rank globally for sisal — production?
Dominican Republic ranks 19th and Western Africa ranks 16th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sisal — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Western Africa: Sisal — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sisal-production/dominican-republic/western-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sisal-production/dominican-republic/western-africa/">Dominican Republic vs Western Africa: Sisal — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sisal — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
43 places, 2,226 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.