Land Locked Developing Countries vs Yugoslav SFR: Sisal — Import Quantity

Land Locked Developing Countries
6 t
in 2013
Yugoslav SFR
950 t
in 1991
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
4th
Yugoslav SFR rank
6th

Sisal — Import Quantity over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries
  • Yugoslav SFR
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k196119872013

How they compare

Yugoslav SFR currently reports 950 t against 6 t in Land Locked Developing Countries, a difference of 944 t.

That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 158.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 4th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 6th of 9 groups.

Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 162.22 t 4,479 t 4,317 t Yugoslav SFR
1970s 102.8 t 6,600 t 6,497 t Yugoslav SFR
1980s 8.2 t 4,644 t 4,636 t Yugoslav SFR
1990s 69 t 2,082 t 2,013 t Yugoslav SFR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sisal — import quantity, Land Locked Developing Countries or Yugoslav SFR?
Yugoslav SFR, at 950 t against 6 t in Land Locked Developing Countries as of 1991.
What is the difference in sisal — import quantity between Land Locked Developing Countries and Yugoslav SFR?
944 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries and Yugoslav SFR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for sisal — import quantity?
Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 4th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 6th of 9 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sisal — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries vs Yugoslav SFR: Sisal — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sisal-import-quantity/land-locked-developing-countries/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sisal-import-quantity/land-locked-developing-countries/yugoslav-sfr/">Land Locked Developing Countries vs Yugoslav SFR: Sisal — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sisal — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
159 places, 7,905 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.