Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Sweden: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
-65 t
in 2023
Sweden
1 t
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
22nd
Sweden rank
3rd

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Sweden
-600-400-2000201020162023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 1 t against -65 t in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 66 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 22nd and Sweden ranks 3rd of 28 groups.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Sweden Difference Ahead
2010s -214.8 t -0.7 t 214.1 t Sweden
2020s -101.25 t 0.25 t 101.5 t Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Sweden?
Sweden, at 1 t against -65 t in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Sweden?
66 t, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Sweden?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Sweden rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 22nd and Sweden ranks 3rd of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Sweden: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-residuals/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-residuals/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/sweden/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Sweden: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 1,470 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.