Namibia vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals
Namibia
0 t
in 2019
Small island developing States (SIDS)
0 t
in 2023
Namibia rank
7th
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
6th
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals over time
- Namibia
- Small island developing States (SIDS)
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Small island developing States (SIDS), a difference of 0 t.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Small island developing States (SIDS) has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 7th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 6th of 89 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals, Namibia or Small island developing States (SIDS)?
- Namibia, at 0 t against 0 t in Small island developing States (SIDS) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals between Namibia and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
- 0 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Small island developing States (SIDS) rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals?
- Namibia ranks 7th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 6th of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.