Namibia vs Oceania: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals
Namibia
0 t
in 2019
Oceania
0 t
in 2023
Namibia rank
7th
Oceania rank
6th
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals over time
- Namibia
- Oceania
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Oceania, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 7th and Oceania ranks 6th of 89 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals, Namibia or Oceania?
- Namibia, at 0 t against 0 t in Oceania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals between Namibia and Oceania?
- 0 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Oceania?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Oceania rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals?
- Namibia ranks 7th and Oceania ranks 6th of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.