Malawi vs Namibia: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals
Malawi
0 t
in 2016
Namibia
0 t
in 2019
Malawi rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals over time
- Malawi
- Namibia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 99 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals, Malawi or Namibia?
- Malawi, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals between Malawi and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2016.
- How do Malawi and Namibia rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals?
- Malawi ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.