Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals
Kazakhstan
0 t
in 2021
Namibia
0 t
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
7th
Namibia rank
7th
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals over time
- Kazakhstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Namibia ranks 7th of 89 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals, Kazakhstan or Namibia?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals between Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals?
- Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Namibia ranks 7th of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.