Iceland vs Namibia: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals
Iceland
0 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2019
Iceland rank
7th
Namibia rank
7th
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals over time
- Iceland
- Namibia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 7th and Namibia ranks 7th of 89 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals, Iceland or Namibia?
- Iceland, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals between Iceland and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals?
- Iceland ranks 7th and Namibia ranks 7th of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.