Belgium vs Sweden: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals
Belgium
1 t
in 2023
Sweden
1 t
in 2023
Belgium rank
3rd
Sweden rank
3rd
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals over time
- Belgium
- Sweden
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 1 t against 1 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.
Belgium ranks 3rd and Sweden ranks 3rd of 89 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -15.7 t | -0.7 t | 15 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | -0.25 t | 0.25 t | 0.5 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals, Belgium or Sweden?
- Belgium, at 1 t against 1 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals between Belgium and Sweden?
- 0 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sweden?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Sweden rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals?
- Belgium ranks 3rd and Sweden ranks 3rd of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.