Barbados vs Namibia: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals
Barbados
0 t
in 2017
Namibia
0 t
in 2019
Barbados rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals over time
- Barbados
- Namibia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 99 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals, Barbados or Namibia?
- Barbados, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals between Barbados and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Barbados and Namibia rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals?
- Barbados ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.