Australia vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals

Australia
0 t
in 2021
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
-65 t
in 2023
Australia rank
7th
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
22nd

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals over time

  • Australia
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
-800-600-400-2000201020162023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 t against -65 t in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 65 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.

Australia ranks 7th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 22nd of 89 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s -178.8 t -101.6 t 77.2 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 0 t -4 t 4 t Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals, Australia or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Australia, at 0 t against -65 t in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2021.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals between Australia and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
65 t, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Australia and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — residuals?
Australia ranks 7th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 22nd of 89 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-residuals/australia/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-residuals/australia/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Australia vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 1,470 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.